Sept. 1 UPDATE: Well, it’s been a very full 3 days since I first posted this. Sarah Palin has so much baggage it can’t be checked at curbside. Corruption charges, flip-flop lying in earmarks for her state (yeah, she’s a “reform” candidate like McCain), ties to Abramoff money, an unwed pregnant teenage daughter, and more. The list is huge. Just Check out Huffington Post. Also, HERE’s a link to read on the Abramoff ties and ethics. And click on the link below which takes you to a great site on Palin written by an Alaskan.
***************************
I’m including reports from several sources here. Obviously it’s a tricky situation. Palin’s former brother-in-law looks anything but clean in his behavior, but Palin herself hardly looks clean in the matter either! As someone big on “ethics reform”, will this come back to haunt her… and McCain?
Palin is also being criticized for not being able to own up to her own mistake in all this. Which leads me to ask, do we need to elect more Republicans who can’t own up to their own mistakes? John McCain, that’s not change from the current administration.
And readers, I offer all this up to you, because I’m catching up on this woman as many people are. The only thing I really knew about Palin before this was that she was elected in 2006, she was Pro-life, and popular in Alaska…(and was previously a mayor of a small town).
Was she fully vetted? Because as I search the web and the news, she does seem, as stated here, to be under active investigation. I’m perplexed, to say the least.
This isn’t the biggest scandal in the world, but nominating someone for VP who is under investigation? Huh?
Where is Palin’s judgment and where is McCain’s judgment?
And readers, HERE’s a link to a post by another person – an Alaskan – on WordPress, who is asking: What was McCain thinking?
What WAS McCain thinking????
From Realclearpolitics.com
August 29, 2008
Palin candidacy raises eyebrows in Alaska
Dan Joling
Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin’s reputation as a crusading reformer after pushing through higher taxes on oil companies has been tarnished by revelations that members of her staff tried to have her former brother-in-law fired from his job as an Alaska state trooper.
She also is under fire from environmentalists for opposing the Bush administration’s decision in May to list the polar bear as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act because global warming is melting the polar ice cap. Palin said the decision could damage the state’s and nation’s economy.
Palin’s rapid ascent in politics followed her appointment in 2003 by then-Gov. Frank Murkowski to Alaska’s Oil and Gas Conservation Commission. From that post, she exposed ethical violations by the state GOP chairman, also a fellow commissioner, who got too close to the oil companies, and later exposed a similar problem involving the state attorney general. Palin’s record on oil is not a simple one.
She supports opening the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve to drilling. But over opposition from oil companies, she pushed through the Alaska Legislature new taxes on the profits from oil pumped on Alaska’s North Slope, arguing that an earlier tax proposal by her predecessor, Murkowski, was too lenient to the industry.
With oil prices soaring, Alaska collected an estimated $6 billion from the new taxes last fiscal year. With the state treasury bulging, she won legislative approval for a special $1,200 payment to every Alaskan to help pay for high energy prices.
She supports a TransCanada Corp. pipeline opposed by Exxon Mobil Corp., ConocoPhillips and BP PLC, the major gas lease holders on the North Slope. They have proposed a separate pipeline venture.
Palin’s approval ratings have ranged from 79 to 86 percent, says Mark Hellenthal, a Republican pollster in Alaska.
“She’s like Saint Sarah up here,” according to Hellenthal.
But she’s hardly without strong critics.
Dermot Cole, a longtime columnist for Alaska’s second-largest newspaper, the Fairbanks Daily News-Miner, called McCain’s choice of Palin reckless and questioned her credentials.
“Sarah Palin’s chief qualification for being elected governor was that she was not Frank Murkowski,” Cole said of her enormously unpopular predecessor, who lost favor with Alaskans in part because of unpopular budget cuts. “She was not elected because she was a conservative. She was not elected because of her grasp of issues or because of her track record as the mayor of Wasilla.”
Former state Rep. Ray Metcalfe, a Republican turned Democrat who was an early whistleblower in an FBI investigation that unearthed waves of corruption in Alaska politics, said his party will have a tough time finding ways to criticize Palin.
Palin, in a move that shook up Alaska’s Republican party, took on the state’s long-term congressional delegation, U.S. Sen. Ted Stevens and Rep. Don Young, calling on them to explain why they’re the target of federal corruption investigations.
Despite her record as a reformer, her own troubles could cause trouble between now and November.
In 2005, before Palin ran for office, the Palin family accused Mike Wooten of drinking beer in his patrol car, illegally shooting a moose and firing a Taser at his 11-year-old stepson. The Palins also claimed Wooten threatened to kill Sarah Palin’s father. Wooten was suspended over the allegations for five days in 2006 but still has his job.
Palin denied her safety commissioner’s dismissal had anything to do with her former brother-in-law and denied orchestrating dozens of telephone calls made by staff and family members to Wooten’s bosses. The investigation launched by state lawmakers is expected to take at least three months.
State Sen. Hollis French, D-Anchorage, said Palin’s candidacy does not change the investigation.
“I think it raises its profile. I don’t think it changes the steps you go through. It is what it is. You have to find out what happened,” French said.
The investigator hired by lawmakers two days ago told the Department of Law it was time to schedule Palin’s deposition, French said.
“The pressure to come up with something is going to be intense,” said Hellenthal, the Republican pollster. “All of a sudden, this thing has assumed much more importance than it had a week ago.”
___
AP reporters Sharon Theimer and H. Josef Hebert in Washington contributed to this report.
From the Anchorage Daily News:
Palin can’t seem to admit she erred
Last Modified: August 17th, 2008 03:20 AM
Gov. Palin is revealing her ugly side during this, her toughest political battle to date. As she continues to dig a deeper hole for herself day by day in the so-called Troopergate scandal, the more desperate she appears. Sarah Palin is not handling the pressure well.
On Thursday Gov. Palin kept digging at Walt Monegan for lying for saying he felt pressured by her administration to fire her former brother-in-law, Mike Wooten.
If Monegan felt pressured to ax the trooper, he would have said so, she said. “I’m sure Monegan would have come to me and said, ‘Call off the dogs, I’m feeling pressure,’ ” Palin said.
Translation: If Walt didn’t like my husband and several members of my administration hounding him relentlessly about firing my ex-brother-in-law, he should have said something. What was he worried about? Was he afraid if he didn’t fire Wooten, I would fire him? What a crazy idea that is.
The governor should really just stop talking when it comes to Troopergate.
We’ll probably never know for sure how much of a factor Monegan’s inaction on Palin’s brother-in-law played in her decision to fire the commissioner.
But in the recording of her right hand man Frank Bailey while lobbying a state trooper to fire Wooten, Bailey says something very revealing about how the governor feels about Monegan.
He says, “I am telling you honestly she really likes Walt a lot but on this issue (trooper Wooten) she feels like she doesn’t know why there is absolutely no action for a year; it’s very troubling for her and the family.”
Even with that recording, the governor continues to insist Monegan’s handling of the Wooten case played no role in his firing. And she continues to criticize Monegan when she should be apologizing to him.
You’ll remember that shortly after his ouster, Monegan said he’d been pressured to fire the governor’s ex-brother-in-law several times by Todd Palin and members of the governor’s staff and even the governor herself.
Palin contradicted Monegan when asked by Channel 2’s Jason Moore if she or anyone in her administration pressured the commissioner to fire Wooten. “No, no, absolutely not. No — I’ve never,” she said.
But then last week she changed her story, admitting members of her administration and/or Todd placed at least two dozen calls regarding Wooten, one of them caught on tape.
You would have thought at the press conference vindicating Monegan she would have publicly apologized to him. But instead she continues to criticize him.
And then, just when you thought she couldn’t dig herself in any deeper, she said this about Alaska state troopers who felt pressured by her never-ending campaign to fire her ex-brother-in-law.
“If that’s pressure, then (after) years in law enforcement, how do they do their job if that’s perceived as pressure?”
Yeah, that’s a good idea. Portray the brave men and women of the Alaska State Troopers as weak because they are afraid of losing their jobs and their ability to feed their families. What’s wrong with these guys?
The governor seems to be saying: Hey, troopers who felt pressured, man up, help me break the state’s personnel rules and stop your bellyaching.
Remember all the complaints the Palin family filed against Wooten have been investigated and punishment was rendered. The governor might not have liked the outcome, but it was taken before Monegan was commissioner. Demanding further action of Monegan is a clear violation of the state’s personnel rules and something Monegan simply could not do.
But there is something in Sarah Palin’s personality that prohibits her from saying, “I screwed up.” She seems to obsess on something and will do almost anything to get her way.
The sad part of it is if she would at any point just come clean, Alaskans would forgive her. They love her.
But nobody likes someone who cannot admit when they are wrong.
Sarah Palin is a classic example of that.
From the tricityherald.com
Did Alaska’s Palin try to force firing of her ex-brother-in-law?
By Lisa Demer
He’s the governor’s ex-brother-in-law, and his job as an Alaska State Trooper is drawing scrutiny in a way rarely seen except in cases of killings by officers.
Legislators are seriously considering hiring an independent investigator to examine whether Gov. Sarah Palin, her aides or her husband pressured commanders to fire Trooper Mike Wooten, and whether she then fired the state’s top cop when Wooten stayed on the job. Palin denies anything like that happened.
All that aside, what kind of trooper is Mike Wooten?
The picture painted by the Palins is pretty bad. The trooper brass isn’t saying one way or another, citing personnel rules that protect his files. Union leaders defend him as a dedicated trooper who was already punished for his mistakes.
Efforts to speak with Wooten were unsuccessful. He did not return phone calls when the controversy first began two weeks ago. He now is out of the country on a long-planned vacation, said John Cyr, executive director of the Public Safety Employees Association, the union for troopers. They are not in touch. An e-mail to Wooten was answered with an out-of-the-office auto reply.
Wooten is 35, a state trooper since March 2001 and an Air Force veteran. He’s a father of young children who has been married and divorced four times.
The accusations are detailed in two thick binders, the result of a nearly yearlong investigation by troopers. When the investigation appeared to stall, Palin — more than a year before she was elected governor, and about two months before launching her campaign — pushed trooper commanders to take action against Wooten. At one point, Palin and her husband, Todd, hired a private investigator.
Wooten recently gave his union permission to release the entire investigative file, all 482 pages and hours of recorded interviews.
“The record clearly indicates a serious and concentrated pattern of unacceptable and at times, illegal activity occurring over a lengthy period, which establishes a course of conduct totally at odds with the ethics of our profession,” Col. Julia Grimes, then head of Alaska State Troopers, wrote in March 1, 2006, letter suspending Wooten for 10 days. After the union protested it, the suspension was reduced to five days.
She warned that if he messed up again, he’d be fired.
“This discipline is meant to be a last chance to take corrective action,” Grimes wrote. “You are hereby given notice that any further occurrences of these types of behaviors or incidents will not be tolerated and will result in your termination.”
It’s nearly impossible to know whether other complaints have come in about Wooten in the last two years. His personnel file is confidential. But the fact he remains on the force is an indication that he hasn’t had the sort of trouble that Grimes warned against.
Grimes declined to comment, as did various troopers involved in the investigation.
‘… NOT WITHOUT A BLEMISH’
As the investigation got under way in 2005, Wooten was in the midst of a bitter divorce from Palin’s sister, Molly McCann. The couple was fighting over custody of their two young children. Accusations flew from both sides.
Troopers eventually investigated 13 issues and found four in which Wooten violated policy or broke the law or both:
– Wooten used a Taser on his stepson.
– He illegally shot a moose.
– He drank beer in his patrol car on one occasion.
– He told others his father-in-law would “eat a f’ing lead bullet” if he helped his daughter get an attorney for the divorce.
Beyond the investigation sparked by the family, trooper commanders saw cause to discipline or give written instructions to correct Wooten seven times since he joined the force, according to Grimes’ letter to Wooten.
Those incidents included: a reprimand in January 2004 for negligent damage to a state vehicle; a January 2005 instruction after being accused of speeding, unsafe lane changes, following too closely and not using turn signals in his state vehicle; a June 2005 instruction regarding personal cell phone calls; an October 2005 suspension from work after getting a speeding ticket; and a November 2005 memo “to clarify duty hours, tardiness and personal business during duty time.”
“Mike is not without a blemish,” the union’s Cyr said. But some of the problems noted by Grimes were small matters, he said. Many troopers were told to reimburse the state for personal cell phone calls, he said. Wooten had to miss work for court during the divorce, he said.
The union president, Rob Cox, is a 17-year trooper veteran who worked alongside Wooten in the Valley. Cox said he never thought of him as a rogue cop.
It’s significant that Wooten served for a while on the Special Emergency Reaction Team — like a SWAT team, Cox said. Officers have to be especially cool-headed to perform in crisis situations, Cox said.
Wooten was the first backup officer to arrive at the scene of a standoff in 2006 at the Valley trailer home of Donald Voorhis.
TROOPER INVESTIGATION
Wooten’s history spilled into public view after the July 11 firing of Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan. The former commissioner has said he doesn’t know why Palin wanted him out but wonders if Wooten’s situation was part of it. He has said that members of Palin’s administration, and the governor’s husband, talked with him about the accusations against Wooten, which he considered improper.
“Never put pressure on Walt Monegan to fire — hire or fire — anybody,” Palin responded.
The troopers’ investigation into Wooten began after Chuck Heath — Wooten’s father-in-law and Palin and McCann’s dad — alerted troopers about a domestic violence protective order McCann had obtained against Wooten on April 11, 2005. McCann filed for divorce the same day, according to the court docket.
The trooper had not physically assaulted his wife but intimidated her and threatened to shoot him, Heath told troopers, according to a memo about the complaint.
The same day, a concerned neighbor of the couple called troopers with more accusations, including alcohol abuse, based on what Heath and McCann had relayed to him. Wooten seemed “disconnected” lately, the neighbor said. He told troopers that Heath and McCann were afraid to call troopers themselves.
“Extreme verbal abuse & violent threats & physical intimidation,” McCann wrote in her April 11, 2005, petition to the court. He had driven drunk multiple times, threatened her father, told her to “put a leash on your sister and family or I’m going to bring them down,” her petition says. A judge issued a 20-day protective order to keep Wooten away.
In written orders to Wooten sent the next day, trooper Capt. Matt Leveque echoed the court’s directive. Leveque, now a major, also told Wooten to give up his department-issued guns, badge, credentials and vehicle during his off-duty time, while the order was in effect.
On April 27, 2005, trooper Sgt. Ron Wall began the internal investigation, interviewing and re-interviewing more than 15 people over a period of months. Witnesses included Palin, her husband, Todd, two of their children, Heath, McCann, her son, Wooten, friends, neighbors, a bartender, and other troopers.
Here’s what the troopers found out:
ILLEGAL MOOSE HUNT
In September 2003, Wooten, McCann and a friend who was a Wasilla police officer, Chris Watchus, hunted moose from a boat in the Jim Creek area.
McCann had drawn a permit for a cow moose but had never done that kind of hunting before, she told troopers in the investigation. They brought Wooten’s rifle, a .300-caliber Winchester Magnum. Chuck Heath had been riding her to make sure the permit was used, Wooten told Wall. It was the last day for the hunt, McCann said. The Mat-Su lottery tags are highly coveted.
Minutes into the trip, they spotted a cow. “Do you want to shoot the moose?” Wooten says he asked his wife. As he recounted it, she told him that she didn’t.
McCann said that Wooten took out the gun and shot the moose.
“I guess I assumingly thought that he would help me sight it in and whatever you do you know to tell me, show me how to do it. Unless he planned all along of just shooting it,” McCann told Wall, according to the transcript.
The first shot didn’t bring it down, so Wooten fired a second time. During the personnel investigation, Wooten initially insisted there was nothing wrong with killing a moose under his wife’s permit. At the time of the interview, he was a wildlife investigator for troopers. He was assigned that job in October 2004, about a year after killing the moose. Before joining the force, he was a wildlife conservation agent on Elmendorf Air Force Base but wasn’t responsible for enforcing rules on moose hunts, he said.
The killing of the moose without a permit was a criminal misdemeanor, Grimes wrote in the March 2006 letter to Wooten. He was removed from wildlife investigations.
Wooten was never charged criminally. Troopers say the moose shooting wasn’t investigated as a crime.
“Once a complaint is received on a trooper, more often than not it goes into what we call an administrative inquiry, and that’s how the discipline is handled,” said Col. Gary Folger, now director of the state Division of Alaska Wildlife Troopers, which was formed after Palin took office in 2007. At least that’s true for wildlife offenses, he said.
Col. Audie Holloway, director of Alaska State Troopers, said he couldn’t speak about wildlife cases in the separate division but said generally, “a trooper has to answer for his crime.” He said he couldn’t talk specifically about Wooten’s situation.
The statute of limitations for shooting a moose without a permit is five years.
TASING THE STEPSON
One day — maybe a year or two before the investigation — Wooten showed his stepson his Taser. He had just been to Taser instructor school. Wooten told Sgt. Wall that the boy was fascinated and pleaded to be tased.
“So we went in our living room and I had him get down on his knees so he wouldn’t fall. And I taped the probes to him and turned the Taser on for like a second, turned it off. He thought that was the greatest thing in the world, wanted to do it again,” Wooten told the investigator. The boy flinched but nothing more, he said. The boy was about 11 at the time.
In his interview with troopers, the stepson said it hurt for about a second, according to Wall’s report. The boy said he wanted to be tased to show his cousin, Palin’s daughter Bristol, that he wasn’t a mama’s boy. The probe left a welt on his arm, he said. His mother was upstairs yelling at them not to do it, the boy said.
As Bristol remembered it, the jolt knocked the boy backward, the trooper report says. She said she was afraid.
The probes are attached by thin wires to the Taser cartridge. In the field, an officer fires the probes into a suspect’s skin or clothing and the suspect receives a jolt of electricity for five seconds, said Steve Tuttle, a spokesman for Taser International, which makes the devices. They are only incapacitated during that time. In demos, the probes might be taped to a person so that they don’t accidentally strike an eye or injure the volunteer, he said. If the Taser is fired for just a second, it would feel like your funny bone was hit but the quick jolt wouldn’t knock you over, Tuttle said.
DRINKING AND DRIVING
Wall evaluated several accusations that Wooten was drinking and driving. He didn’t substantiate them. Some came only from McCann and family.
But Grimes re-interviewed a couple who lived nearby and found them believable about an incident that occurred in the summer of 2004. Adrian and Marilyn Lane told her they are friends of the Heaths but wouldn’t lie to help the family.
Wooten stopped by their house one morning in his white patrol car and drank a beer from the fridge in the garage, the couple said. On his way out, he grabbed another beer, popped it open, and got behind the wheel, they both told Grimes.
“And I was like ‘Whoa!’ ” Adrian Lane said. They both thought he needed to watch himself.
Wooten contended he never drank in his patrol car. Grimes determined that he did.
Troopers looked into another drinking episode that occurred late one night in March 2005.
Wooten was at the Mug-Shot Saloon with a friend. Wooten got into it with another man, whom he thought was causing trouble for his friend. Wooten’s friend had to hold him back, and the bartender held back the other man, the bartender told troopers.
Wooten told the bartender he needed to eject the other man, the bartender said.
The bartender thought Wooten was out of line.
“Then he whipped out his badge and said ‘Let me introduce myself. I’m State Trooper Wooten,” the bartender said, according to a transcript of his interview.
The other man took a cab.
Wooten and his friend left in a black Audi, with Wooten driving. It belonged to the friend’s brother but the friend was drunk, Wooten told the investigator.
Barely two blocks away, Trooper Dave Herrell pulled them over. Wooten jumped out to talk to him. Herrell told the trooper investigator that he “felt kinda weird” when he realized the driver was another trooper.
The bartender had called in to report Wooten as a possible drunken driver. “Said that you guys were severely intoxicated and caused a fight in the bar and then you guys left,” Wooten told the investigator, recounting what Herrell said.
As Herrell remembered it, “I was sitting there talking to him and I smelled … just a faint odor of alcohol that was coming from his breath,” according to a transcript.
Herrell, who said he was No. 1 at the Palmer post with more than 250 drunken-driving arrests, didn’t think Wooten seemed drunk. He didn’t slur, his eyes weren’t bloodshot or watery. Herrell didn’t ask him to take any field sobriety or breath tests. That’s always up to the officer’s discretion, troopers say.
Was Wooten drunk?
“No,” Herrell told Wall. “I believe that he consumed an alcoholic beverage, but I don’t believe that he’s intoxicated. Or overly intoxicated above .08.”
That’s the legal limit for driving.
Still, Herrell, who is now a sergeant, told Wooten to park the car. He gave the men a lift back to the friend’s house.
McCann told the trooper investigator that Wooten called her about 3 a.m. to pick him up. They were separated, but he still came to the house to shower and get his things. He told her he and his friend “tore down the house last night” and were pulled over. “Oh I can play a good sober when I need to,” he said, according to what she told troopers.
In his investigation, Wall didn’t find that Wooten broke any policies or laws that night.
“F’ING BULLET”
The other incident happened in February 2005. Both McCann and Palin gave troopers detailed accounts of what happened. Wooten was headed home in a rage, McCann said.
She called Palin and put the phone on speaker so Palin could listen when Wooten got there and get help if things got bad. Palin had her teenage son Track listen in, too.
As McCann remembered it, Wooten said if their father got a lawyer for her “he would eat a f’ing lead bullet. I will shoot him.”
Palin was interviewed by troopers too.
“Mike in the conversation never did get to the bottom of what, what the foundational issue he was dealing with, he just kept screaming, “I’m gonna F’n kill your dad if he gets an attorney to help you,” Palin told troopers, according to the transcript.
Track told troopers he heard the comment, too.
Palin drove over and watched through the window. She and McCann both said Wooten was all wound up. A neighbor who stood watch as well later told troopers that Wooten looked angry but that McCann wasn’t cowering or anything.
Wooten told troopers he never said anything like that about his father-in-law.
The investigation concluded he did. It wasn’t a crime, because he didn’t threaten Heath directly. But it did violate trooper policy, the investigation found.
In August 2005, nearly four months after the investigation began, Palin wrote a lengthy e-mail to Grimes about Wooten that included some new accusations and new witnesses. She wrote that she was writing not as his sister-in-law but to express concern over the lack of action about a trooper whom she said many described as a “ticking timebomb” and “loose cannon.”
In October 2005, Palin announced she was running for governor. Sgt. Wall, who is now a lieutenant over patrol in Fairbanks, finished his investigation the same month. The following March, Grimes handed out the punishment.
The union’s Cyr says that ultimately Wooten was treated fairly by the Department of Public Safety.
“Clearly the folks have the ability to file complaints, and the state has the obligation to investigate them and that is what was done. He was disciplined, appropriately so we believe in the end. And you know, basically end of story. The only question in our mind would be has this pattern continued and has pressure been brought on anybody, I mean, after this whole sorry mess.”
Wooten and McCann’s divorce was finalized in January 2006. They continue to have disputes over custody and visitation.
Since that divorce, Wooten remarried and divorced again.
He remains on the force in Wasilla.
IN A SEMI-RELATED STORY:
Also from tricityhearald.com:
Alaska’s Gov. Palin apologizes as state’s top cop resigns
Aug. 29, 2008
By Megan Holland
Alaska Public Safety Commissioner Chuck Kopp resigned late Friday after less than two weeks on the job after a flurry of questions about a 2005 sexual harassment complaint.
In a brief news conference with Gov. Sarah Palin in her Anchorage office, Kopp said he was stepping down effective immediately. Kopp, appointed to replace former Commissioner Walt Monegan, who Palin fired, said recent scrutiny of the sexual harassment complaint had been too hard on his family.
Neither Kopp nor the governor answered questions.
“We’re going to move forward now,” Palin said. “This has been brutal on a good family.”
No replacement has been announced.
Said Palin: “This has been a tumultuous week in the Department of Public Safety, and as your governor, I apologize.”
“This is in the best interest of Alaska at this point,” she said.
Palin appointed Kopp as the state’s top cop job the same day she fired Monegan, on Friday, July 11. She announced his appointment on Monday, July 14.
At a press conference the next day, July 15, to talk about the new direction of Public Safety, the press pounded Kopp with questions about the sexual harassment complaint after rumors began circulating. Under visible stress, he said he did not have a history of sexual harassment complaints against him and that no complaint ever resulted in a lawsuit against the city or himself.

29 Comments
August 29, 2008 at 5:47 pm
My gosh, what a tangled web McCain is weaving!!!
What a decision. There weren’t even McCain/Palin signs today. That makes me believe that McCain decision was a ‘reaction’ to the success of the DNC and the Palin decision was pretty sudden and Palin was not completely vetted.
August 29, 2008 at 5:52 pm
Paulette, my thoughts exactly. What was the vetting process. And he only met her twice. I’m beginning to believe it was a horrible choice for him!
I don’t get it. I really knew nothing about her before this, except she was a popular Gov. of Alaska.
But she’s under investigation? I’m perplexed by how this can be and McCain still chose her.
What am I missing? Does it just not matter?
August 29, 2008 at 8:33 pm
This is a stunning choice especially in light of this information which became public only hours after this announcement. What more will they find in the days ahead?
It is obvious that they made the decision last night over drinks. There really is no other explanation.
And about the vetting – McCain admittedly knows nothing of the internet so they didn’t even Google her. They probably only asked her to spell ‘potatoe’.
August 29, 2008 at 8:37 pm
McCain can choose someone under investigation, because he’s been investigated so many times, it doesn’t bother him anymore. He wants someone like him, a self-proclaimed reformer, who needs reforming.
He is such a misogynist that he thinks all he has to do is switch skirts, and women will be stupid enough to follow along. How dismissive. He is desperate and this shows his true colors.
But he is against equal pay for women, so maybe Palin would make less than Biden and save the treasury a few thousand dollars. With the increased national debt McCain would incur, this country needs the extra bucks.
August 29, 2008 at 8:57 pm
my2bucks and amma, you slay me. i’m in hysterics.
I guess after the Keating investigation/scandal, this is small “potatoez”.
August 29, 2008 at 9:32 pm
Right back at ya, Bruce!
August 29, 2008 at 11:01 pm
The saddest thing is that is not just corruption and abuse of power that is at their feet; it is the blood of many innocent women and children.
I am a Christian, and believe me, abortion issues or gay issues cannot compare with the crimes that these people have done against humanity in the name of God. I truly believe they will use any issue to keep power.
Jesus said to heal the broken hearted, feed the poor, house the homeless, care for the widows, and above all else, do unto to others as you would have them do unto you. Instead, they promulgate hate, they refuse decent living wages, and I would bet that all of that wasteful spending that Palin says she has cut is directly related to things like programs for women’s health, Head Start, and homeless shelters. They all have blood on their hands.
August 29, 2008 at 11:08 pm
Jay, I wish more Christians could admit there that Bush administration and the like have blood on their hands.
Clinton in office got a blowjob. Big deal. Bush invades a country without true cause and innocent soldiers and civilians are killed. It’s mind-boggling to me how he and Cheney were never impeached with all the evidence piled against them.
I see there are even some evangelicals coming around to your position (instead of just focusing on abortion and gay issues as their cause). They’re talking about helping the needy, protecting our environment, ending the war, and more. And these are people who have voted Republican in the past.
Maybe change really is in the wind.
August 30, 2008 at 4:46 am
Palin is hardly a credible choice. For months McCain and the gang have touted experience and now he selects a former mayor of a hamlet and first term governor to be a heartbeat away from the presidency. At his age and with his own health record this was an important decision and he needed to select someone with a little more perspective on national politics. I am also reading that Pawlenty and Romeny are a little steamed because he used them as decoys when they knew they were going to select Palin. So there may be some party in fighting this week.
http://www.ebonymompolitics.wordpress.com
August 30, 2008 at 5:35 am
Yes musesofamom, something is amiss (no pun intended). I think much is due to be brought out about Palin this week during the convention.
August 30, 2008 at 5:43 am
I really hope once Obama and McCain debate, everything will be put into perspective for all the Obama haters out there…
If McCain dies there is no way Palin has more experience than Obama on anything to lead this nation..
http://andthisismyamerica.wordpress.com/2008/08/29/the-dnc-recap/
August 30, 2008 at 6:41 am
[...] Who the heck is Bruce? Interesting McCain chose Palin when she is under scrutiny and investigation [...]
August 30, 2008 at 6:44 am
hey logicalsmoker, what u been smokin’…logic?
August 30, 2008 at 7:21 am
Great post, Bruce. I’m on a three day vacation so I only get small doses of Internet and you did a fine job. Keep up the good work.
This is typical McCain, ready, aim, fire. He is a reactionary, he doesn’t take the time to think before he reacts.
Obama should sic Hillary Clinton on this woman. Hillary will tear her apart.
August 30, 2008 at 7:34 am
I’ve no doubt Hillary will go after her.
August 30, 2008 at 9:06 am
Hillary will make mince meat out of this woman,or should I say moose meat.
God help us if Mc Cain and Palin are elected to lead this country,if we think we are in trouble now just wait and see what will happen to us then.
Hopefully for once in our lives the American people put party affiliations aside and do the right thing.We need Obama if we want to become once again a people who have pride in their country and the envy of the rest of the world because we live in America.
August 30, 2008 at 9:13 am
Yes, wouldn’t it be nice to turn our country around? And our place in the world?
August 30, 2008 at 9:34 am
[...] Keep dressing like this and people will forget you’re under investigation. Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Good eatsIF YOU’RE NOT FOR [...]
August 30, 2008 at 12:34 pm
…the man has to be senile!
August 30, 2008 at 4:09 pm
Something’s fishy here. I don’t believe the Republicans are this stupid. They must believe that McCain has no chance of winning and they’re looking for fall-persons, a way of explaining the loss. Palin and the McCain’s campaign people can now be blamed for the whole thing. I’ve kind of thought all along that McCain was only chosen to ride out an election that Republicans know can’t be won.
August 30, 2008 at 6:44 pm
love this site it’s great
August 30, 2008 at 9:23 pm
[...] Interesting McCain chose Palin when she is under scrutiny and investigation « the bruce blog Posted in politicalTags: McCain, McSame [...]
August 31, 2008 at 12:32 am
Now, for a more important question by someone who also knows this potential veep’s conservative cred’s.
If she has an “updo” every day that’s at least 2-3 hours of hair maintenance out of her daily schedule. I had one updo in my life and it was for my one and only wedding. Not to mention the hardware store my husband removed from my head later that day. Environmentally it was bad once, much worse every day. I saved the pins, still have them.
Perhaps we should put her in touch with John Edward’s barber. Let’s take a weekly $200 cut vs. three hours a day in a beautician’s chair and divide it by the VP’s salary….
Something to think about.
September 1, 2008 at 9:50 am
This was a gimme…
Obama ‘08
http://andthisismyamerica.wordpress.com/2008/09/01/bristol-is-bad-little-girl/
September 1, 2008 at 1:17 pm
[...] She’s supposed to be a reformer, a paragon of principled politics. Turns out she is in the middle of an investigation for sketchy firings of State Troopers for personal reasons. Alaskan newspapers openly question [...]
September 2, 2008 at 5:12 am
good
September 2, 2008 at 7:30 pm
Hi Bruce,
Thank you for the updates. I just posted a piece about the vetting process. I’m curious to learn more about this process.
http://beyondthepretty.wordpress.com/
~Tracy
September 2, 2008 at 9:38 pm
I supported her originally and I think we all supported her because she represented change from the old guard. And I think that’s why McCain chose her as well. But now it appears she is a true politician: She’ll say whatever works to get what she wants and under the national spotlight her credibility is disintegrating by the minute.
Regarding Troopergate: This really should be the least of her concerns. Trooper Wooten (her ex brother-in-law) really does appear to be a rogue cop. He shot a moose on his wife’s tag and got away with it when the rest of us would have been arrested. He got thrown out of a bar in Wasilla for being drunk, the barkeep called the police on him and when Wooten was pulled over by another trooper that cop decided he should leave Wooten’s car there and gave him a ride home but didn’t give him a breathalyzer! The story goes quite a bit further but it appears to be a case of troopers looking out for each other and I wouldn’t have a problem with Palin firing Commissioner Monegan for just that reason, though she says she didn’t. Monegan himself stated emphatically that he had no idea why he had been fired but then he changed his story and said he “felt pressure” from the Palin administration and the investigation ensued. Another note for the record: According to the Anchorage Daily News, Trooper Wooten didn’t “taser his kid” as a diciplinary action. At the kid’s own request (showing off for his friends) Wooten taped the electrodes to the kid’s arm and gave him a one second burst.
But here’s what’s bugging me: The rumor began that her child, born April 18, 2008, was not hers but actually her daughter’s. That would seem to be an incredibly filthy form of yellow journalism that would be so easy to put an end to. So why hasn’t she done so? Why doesn’t she just pull out the birth certificate and say “look, here’s my name, here’s the baby’s name, here’s the date, here’s the doctor’s name and that’s all there is to it. Now get out of my face and don’t ever mention that crap again!” Why, instead, has she said her daughter couldn’t have been pregnant then because she is pregnant now? It’s like opening a second can of worms to put the lid on the first one. If she really is concerned about her daughter’s privacy why would she choose this as the way to deal with such an easily disproved rumor? That gets an Alaskan to wondering, as fit and trim as she is, how did she make it to her seventh month of pregnancy without her own staff ever realizing it? And according to the Anchorage Daily News the child was born at Mat-Su Regional Medical Center and yet I keep rechecking their website’s baby calander and Palin’s child just isn’t there. There may be a very good reason for this but why can’t I find it? Why hasn’t the media found it? Why is this unfolding as a soap opera when it just shouldn’t need to be?
I have no idea what’s really going on here but who needs Hollywood?
September 2, 2008 at 9:53 pm
Alaskan, thanks for your comment.
It does sound like from all I’ve read Palin’s ex-brother-in-law is a class A jerk. But, that does not excuse her if she did abuse her position. She was let off the hook by the court when she was mayor of Wasilla for firing the police chief because he supported her political rival. That was an interesting judicial decsion.
Anyway, I hear you on the baby thing. I looked at one website last night in which I saw a pic of her taken in February at a political event. She would have been 7 months pregnant. She was not even showing.
Nice to hear you’ve followed up some and are perplexed. I think this merits more attention.
Comments are closed.